About ALA
ALA Services
ALA Resources
ALA Programs
Corporate Spelling Bee
ALA Links
Penn State Beaver
Home

 

 

 

Planning A Workplace Literacy Program

Workplace Planning Profiles

EMPLOYEES TEACHING EMPLOYEES
AlliedSignal Aerospace Company
Kansas City, Missouri

Date of Interview: 1991

Employees Teaching Employees is a volunteer literacy program developed and conducted by the Kansas City, Missouri, division of AlliedSignal Aerospace Company. The plant has about 6,500 employees. About half are on salary and the other half are hourly workers.

The company's literacy program provides one-to-one tutoring in basic literacy skills to 65 employees. Tutor training is provided by trainers from Laubach Literacy of Kansas City.

AlliedSignal's training staff and its employee-volunteers carry out most of the functions of a community-based volunteer literacy program. Staff members recruit and match learners and tutors, provide tutor support, monitor learner progress, and maintain records.

The plant's senior management is highly supportive of the program. They want literacy instruction to benefit employees both on and off the job. Literacy instruction is offered on company time to show management's strong support for the program.

The program has improved job performance and morale. Impressed with their program's results, senior managers have been active in promoting literacy programming to other members of the corporate sector.

Program Development

In 1988 the training staff of the manufacturing division began meeting weekly to develop a training team and to identify employee needs. Literacy instruction soon emerged as a top priority.

The training team discovered that some employees couldn't read course materials for technical courses like statistical process control and advanced production techniques. They found that supervisors who wanted to protect literacy-handicapped employees commonly placed them in noncritical assignments. Some employees were relying on coworkers to read job instructions to them.

The team needed an idea of the extent of the literacy problem in the workplace. Reading and writing tests were not part of the plant's job application process, and such testing on the job was not permitted. Depending on their own observations and general literature about adult literacy needs in general, the trainers estimated that as many as several hundred of the plant's employees could benefit from literacy instruction.

After the training team identified literacy as a priority, the team coordinator went to work. One of the coordinator's most important tasks was to build employee support and enthusiasm throughout the plant. The coordinator also needed to research literacy program models, clear policy decisions with superiors, and make sure that systems were in place for administering a program.

Senior managers gave the coordinator the authority she needed to develop and implement a program plan. Senior managers also gained the cooperation of lower and middle managers when it was needed and served as "cheerleaders" for the program.

One of the coordinator's first tasks was to find an effective program that would fit the training department's budget. An employee was sent to the tutor training workshop offered by Laubach Literacy of Kansas City. The employee's experience at the workshop convinced the coordinator that it was reasonable to expect that literacy services could be provided effectively through trained volunteer tutors.
Another task was to find a way to encourage employees with literacy problems to identify themselves. The training team offered a 10-hour course titled "Efficient Reading." The course was built around a set of videotapes and included comprehension and speed reading. The course leader told the 300 attendees that basic reading instruction would be available for those who wanted it.

The first employee to request basic skills instruction came forward only when a member of the training team, who had observed his struggle to read in technology training courses, suggested that he contact the training coordinator. The employee was placed with the Laubach-trained employee-tutor. After four months of tutoring, his progress showed the training staff that employee-tutors could be effective in helping their coworkers acquire literacy skills.

Tutor trainers from Laubach Literacy of Kansas City agreed to train company volunteer tutors at the worksite and to schedule the training workshop during the workday. They also consulted with AlliedSignal staff on other aspects of program development.

A breakthrough came when that first employee-student agreed to tell his story. He and his tutor were videotaped for broadcast over the company's in-house network. The student, who was shown on the job and at a tutoring session, talked about his literacy-related problems and his experiences with learning.

The tutor described the program, explaining that it took place on company time. He promised that confidentiality would be maintained and asked those interested in volunteering as tutors or learners to call the training coordinator. As soon as the video was over, the phone began to ring.

The first workshop was not designed for tutor training only. It was also an opportunity to build understanding about the program. Both managers and union leaders were specifically encouraged to participate. The support of union leaders and others who had direct contact with potential students was essential. These people could provide reassurance that the program was not intended to penalize anyone for their literacy deficiencies.

Several employees who attended the first tutor workshop offered to rehabilitate a long-unused area of the plant for the program's use. They were joined by other volunteers, both tutors and students. When they had finished, the new literacy program had two classrooms, eight tutoring cubicles, and a combined library and computer learning center, all freshly painted and carpeted. An open house attracted 1,000 employees, and senior management declared the day Reading Awareness Day.

Program format

Instructional materials used in AlliedSignal's program include the Laubach Way to Reading series and the Challenger Adult Reading Series. Volunteers are trained in a 12-hour workshop developed by Laubach Literacy Action. Employees attend the workshop on company time.

Tutor trainers from Laubach Literacy of Kansas City are still under contract. However, several AlliedSignal employees who have assisted with the training workshops are developing their own expertise and meeting the requirements to become certified tutor trainers. Once the program develops enough volunteer trainers of its own, funds will no longer need to be spent for outside trainers.

Employee-tutors come from 37 different departments throughout the plant. About half the tutors are salaried and half are hourly employees. Tutors include engineers, secretaries, supervisors, and laborers.

Although tutors use a core series of students at the lower levels, they also devise their own instructional activities, like writing personal checks or reading workplace signs. They have developed other company-related materials as well. For example, each manufacturing operation at the plant is described in a separate set of written instructions called a traveller. A tutor-developed traveller on how to make a hot dog familiarizes students with the basic format of one of the company's most common job-related documents.
Monthly meeting provide tutors with an opportunity to discuss issues raised by the tutoring process and share success stories. A periodic written update keeps tutors informed of meetings, new developments within the program., and the availability of new instructional materials. Staff members assigned to the volunteer program are also available to consult individually with tutors.

Tutors and students are paired according to their work shifts. If matches are not successful, learners are free to request another tutor. Because the plant is so large, it is not difficult to match learners and tutors who do not know each other if learners prefer this approach.

Steps have been taken to keep the identity of literacy students confidential. The training coordinator assigns each learner a number, and all files and progress records are kept by number. Learners and tutors carry their tutoring materials in identical folders. If the learner does not wish to work in the learning center, the tutoring pair is free to find an alternative site. Because the plant's employees are involved in many different kinds of training programs, regular absences from the workstation do not identify employees as basic literacy students. Thus only the program coordinator and the tutor need be aware of an employee's participation in the program.

After the basic reading and writing program was launched, a math program was developed using the Breakthrough to Math series (New Readers Press). The math program, which enrolls several hundred learners, provides instruction ranging from basic addition and subtraction to algebra and geometry. Volunteer math tutors, many of whom are drawn from the plant's engineering staff, work with four to seven learners in small-group sessions.

The company is also adding a GED component, which will reach a new employee audience and also provide more advanced instruction for employees who finish the basic literacy program. Plans call for hiring experienced GED staff to offer three-hour classes four days a week. GED classes are scheduled to overlap both the first and second shifts by and hour-and-a-half. GED students will attend six of the twelve class hours on company time and six on their own time.

Cost and Benefits

The start-up costs of the volunteer literacy program included $7,200 for instructional materials for 100 basic literacy tutors and learners. The services of the literacy trainers, who spend four days preparing and presenting each tutor workshop, are compensated at a rate comparable to that received by professional trainers working in industry.

The company's biggest investment in the program is in the paid time employees devote to tutoring and learning. (Program participants are expected to perform their regular jobs without collecting overtime pay, however.)

In the company's view, the program's benefits are well worth its costs. Supervisors note that learners have more positive attitudes towards their work. Learners refer to their ability to use their new skills both on the job and in their personal lives.

Employee-tutors welcome the satisfaction that comes from helping others. Senior managers are pleased by the new organization, leadership, listening, communication, and time management skills that tutors develop. The program has the effect of dissolving the boundary between hourly and salaried employees, and has also generated a new sense of employee pride in the company.

Losses from manufacturing products that do not meet specifications are also declining. Although this cannot be directly traced to the literacy effort, program leaders believe there is a correlation.

The media in the Kansa City area have given the program and AlliedSignal favorable publicity for offering literacy services, and other area employers view the program with respect.

Outreach

The staff at AlliedSignal has presented the program at several national trade conferences and responds to frequent inquiries about the program from other corporations. A second Allied division has implemented its own employee volunteer tutoring program. Laubach Literacy of Kansas City trainers have also met with other local corporations to describe how to organize a workplace literacy program.


Date of Interview: 1996

More than six years have passed since the inception of AlliedSignal's workplace literacy program. Peg Otten, an LLA-certified trainer employed by Allied, is the program's current coordinator. Mrs. Otten reports that although the company has been downsized by nearly 3,000 employees, the program has grown and remained effective. Management support and employee participation are high.

To date, the program has served more than 125 reading students and 1,000 math students. These workers' new skills have benefited them both on the job and in other areas of their lives. At present, the program includes 13 volunteer trainers (and apprentice trainers) and 50 volunteer tutors, all Allied employees. Trainers from Laubach Literacy of Kansas are no longer needed because the company has developed its own training capacity. The program is serving about 30 students at any given time.

Mrs. Otten has some helpful suggestions for council wanting to begin a workplace literacy program:

Stay low-cost. Don't order a wealth of materials in a burst of initial enthusiasm. First find out what your learners actually need. And don't feel that effective literacy work requires an elaborate setting or expensive equipment. One or two small cubicles big enough for two people is all you need. If you stay low-cost, your program is more likely to be around next year.

Don't train more tutors than you need at any given time. Let actual student demand drive the number of tutors you train. Otherwise, trained tutors may languish for months without a student-and lose interest in the process.

Strive for effective training. Some hallmarks of effective workplace training are: respect for employees' time limits, high degree of organization, use of current statistics, minimal socialization, and highly skilled (and well-practiced) trainers with diverse perspectives of the organization in which they work.

Don't feel you need to stick with one core curriculum. Not all learners will benefit from the same curriculum. Let the learner's skill levels and needs be your guide when you are choosing a curriculum for that learner. Be diverse enough in the training of tutors to include "hands-on" involvement with several different types of materials.

Use appropriate materials. Beyond the basic level, use materials that are topical, well organized and adult. Students who are above the fourth or fifth reading level are often drawn to materials that are fact oriented rather than story or "people" oriented.

Let the policy makers of the program be the control for the program. A healthy program listens to and makes decisions based on: the needs of the students, the needs of management, the views of trainers and tutors, and (if applicable) the needs of the union. A governing board make up of people from all areas of the company who are related to the program (especially students) is in the best position to work effectively to overcome obstacles the program might meet.

Go to conferences. Ongoing networking and learning by those involved in a workplace literacy program are essential.

If you would like to be in touch with Mrs. Otten to discuss workplace literacy issues, she would welcome your call at (816) 997-2618.

next page

 

 

 
 
   
336 COLLEGE AVENUE      BEAVER PA 15009     724.773.7810   ALACTION@PSU.EDU